Archive - e-book RSS Feed

Will e-publishing lead to a literary mine field?

I’m not a publisher, agent, or published author. I’m an aspiring author, who listens to the wisdom of those who have gone before him and pays attention to literary trends. With that said, please do not take this blog as authoritative or having come from first hand experience. Rather, take it as a student of the written word passing on what he has learned to you.

Almost 40 years ago, Dan Poynter couldn’t find a publisher, so he went straight to the printer and started the trend of self-publishing. Four decades later, self-publishing and the Internet have led to e-publishing. Now, websites like FastPencil, iPadPublishing, and Blurb help people self-publish their books in paper or as e-books.

Over the last decade, because of social networking, it seems agents and publishers have turned their attention more toward finding marketable writers with compelling stories. And it seems the success of writers has been determined more by writers’ writing good content and reaching out to readers.

Now, the advent of e-books and e-publishing will cause a new literary trend. Self-publishing and e-publishing have lowered the publishing bar, and because of that people can’t assume a book is good simply because it has been published. They need to rely on that book’s content. But they won’t know anything about that book’s content unless others who have read that book give them their thoughts.

From my vantage point, I foresee e-publishing causing the roles of the writer, agent, publisher, and even reader to change.  Ever hear that saying, ‘Everyone’s a critic’? The role of the publisher and agent will merge into one marketing entity (publishing consultants). The writer will reach out and listen more to the reader through traditional and social media marketing. And the reader will become like the agent, reading critically, and passing on their opinions to other readers.

All of this means that rather than the writer trying to seek the approval of a few people in the publishing industry, they will have to find an audience and seek the approval of their audience. And as that author’s audience approves more and more or less and less, that author will need listen to their audience (or the lack thereof).  I foresee the writer’s insurmountable publishing mountain will become a daunting literary mine field. Tread carefully, fellow writer.

Whether you’re a writer, agent, publisher, or even a reader, I’d love to hear from you.  How do you think the advent of e-books and e-publishing will change the literary world? Do you think lowering the publishing bar will even the playing field, forcing writers to write more well-written content and compelling stories? Or, do you think a lower publishing standard will simply water down good content, allowing anyone to become an author? I encourage your thoughts.

For more on me and my literary endeavors, follow me on Twitter @ErickWrites, befriend me on Facebook, or just e-mail me and ask.

Erick

E-book Piracy and the Value of Literature

For this week, I would like to explore the ethical issue of e-book piracy, so please read and respond to this blog with your thinking caps on.

Books lose their value due to wear and tear; but it is the e-reader, rather than the e-book, that loses value due to both wear and tear and new technology. Since what causes a physical book to lose value does not cause an e-book to lose value, the issue of e-book piracy is a two part issue. First, it is an issue of what we as readers allow to determine the value of literature. Second, it is the issue of what determines the deterioration of the value of that literature.

If it’s not considered stealing to rummage through a used book store’s free book bin, is there a point that an e-book, perhaps 20 years from now, will also lose value? What will cause it to lose its value? If a I can borrow a physical book from a library, shouldn’t I be allowed to borrow an e-book from a library? If I cannot borrow e-books from libraries, why should I buy an e-reader? For me, convenience is not enough.

Perhaps, with e-books, publishers will come out with a technology that allows friends and libraries to transfer e-books provided they agree that e-book be erased from their computer or e-reader. In the case of author royalties, perhaps authors, publishers, and distributors should raise e-book prices, thus accounting for waste and theft.

I am of the persuasion that literature is created to be shared not hoarded, but never stolen or pirated. How should authors and publishers handle e-book piracy? Should they raise e-book prices to adjust for potential piracy? Should they shy away from selling e-books much like so many would be authors never publish because of fears that someone will steal their ideas? I’d love to hear any thoughts or suggestions.

Again, my question is not about what defines e-book piracy, rather it’s where do the ethical lines of what is e-book piracy begin and end, as well as what determines the value and the deterioration of the value of literature? It’s obviously stealing to walk into a Barnes & Noble, take a book off a book shelf, and walk out of the store without paying for it. It’s not considered stealing to go to a library and borrow a book. If authors have a right to expect readers not to download pirated copies of their books, readers have a right to expect that they can share that author’s information with other readers in an ethical way.

Perhaps, aspiring authors, such as myself, can take a lesson from names like Harriet Beecher Stowe, William Faulkner, and Fyodor Dostoyevsky who determined the value of literature according to strong content that caused people to think and change society rather than fluffy literature that did nothing more than allow people to further delude themselves from the ills of society.

Next week, I’ll explore the issue of e-publishing, so make sure to come back.

Erick

Is the iPad just an iFad?

For those of you who follow me on Twitter, you might have seen my snide remark about the Kindle’s black and white screen. I think I said something about it being 2010, not 1910.  Let’s just say, they’re a little behind, asthetically.  Since it’s too late for Amazon’s Kindle to lead the charge, they at least need to take the hint and catch up.

For now, there’s a new kid . . . er . . . I mean e-reader on the block, and this one rivals the iPad. Or as I like to call it, the iFad. I’d like to introduce ‘Novel‘ by Pandigital.

So, let me tell you about some of the cool features. Starting with the built in dictionary. One of my pet peeves is when authors insist on using big words that require dictionaries. Apparently, Pandigital gets frustrated with that also, because this e-reader comes with a dictionary.

Another great feature is for people like me, who actually enjoy 19th century Russian literature (i.e. Doestoevsky), but sometimes get confused with the names and places (not the words, though). Just search for a name or place by keyword and Novel will let you know who’s who, what’s what, and where’s where.

Okay, so you want more, and this e-reader gives you more. Pandigital teamed up with Barnes & Noble to bring you over 1,000,000 e-book titles to select from Novel. Each title includes a book summary, plot overviews, and more.

Now, if you’re anything like me, you can’t go for long without checking your e-mail and various social networking sites. Pandigital understands it’s important to keep up with what’s going on in the world of social media marketing, so they equipped this e-reader with a Web browser. And some of the features integrate your experience with social media.

Among a few of the other features of the Novel is the built-in camera, digital audio player (yes, there’s a place for your headphones), and more.

For now, if you really reall really must have the latest in technology, you might want to get the iFad, because the Novel by Pandigital won’t come out until sometime in June.

But, here’s the good news for those who can wait. It runs on Google’s Android, and it starts at just $199.

For more information, check out this great vid by Cnet.

Improve the web with Nofollow Reciprocity.